Thursday, April 24, 2014

Modernization Theory: Native Americans (SumBlog11)

This week in class we discussed the concept of modernization.  Modernization is a process of assimilation that is global, absolute, homogenizing, irreversible, and desirable to the Western world (thus it is Western in origin).  When we were discussing this concept, I felt like some of the best and most drastic examples of this could be found in the history of the US.


The above video demonstrates a perfect example of the modernization theory.  European’s arrived in a country that was already inhabited, and almost immediately began imposing their will upon the Native Americans by choosing a path of manifest destiny.  The only problem was that natives stood in their way, but in the name of “progress” they chose to strip the land from them.  To add injury to insult, they then opened Indian boarding schools and forced Native’s to assimilate to their Western culture, language, and religion.  These efforts were justified with the logic that they were “killing the Indian to save the man,” suggesting that the Native way of life was inferior.

By their own account, European Americans were trying to convert Native Americans to Christianity so that they could be saved religiously.  They also claimed that they were educating them in Western culture so that they could be successful in the new America.  However, throughout the process Natives were forced to give up on their own cultures and norms for fear of being brutally punished by the administrators of the boarding schools. 

I feel like this is an extreme example of modernization, but it demonstrates that the modernization theory has been demonstrated in the past.  The government specifically chose to totally and irreversibly change young Native Americans in the name of progress and more desirable Western attributes.  I feel that this is a shame because it oppressed both the people and the culture that was here long before we were.  I feel that America would be a far different place, that I personally would like to have seen, had the two cultures found a way to obtain cultural hybridization rather than homogenization.

Thursday, April 17, 2014

Power (SumBlog10)

In class this week we discussed the difference between power and authority.  We learned that power is domination over another group or individual while authority is legitimate domination over others.  In other words, domination is authorized and respected power. 


While trying to find a video that related to what we talked about in class yesterday I came across the one that I have posted a link to below.  I thought that the video was thought provoking in that it suggests that we are in control of whom and what has power over our lives.  I also thought it was implying that we become too content with the way things are, to the point that we never question our reality.  At the end of the video it advocates that we stop just “letting go” of the power that is ours to give, but rather that we truly think about situations and be more prudent in who we give power and authority to.


In the United States power has been harder and harder to come by in recent decades.  Generally, only those with money or the ability to intimidate (or both) find themselves in positions of power in our society.  However, even more upsetting is the fact that these people also seem to hold a vast majority of the authority positions.

Running for office (president, senate, house, or governor) is an expensive and timely thing to do, and therefore it has become nearly impossible for people from the middle class to hold these positions of authority.  My opinion is that this phenomenon has led to many of the problems that our society now faces.  People with the highest forms of authority and power cannot do what is best for America when they cannot relate to the vast majority of Americans.  Even worse, anyone with enough power in the form of money can often lobby to get our leaders to vote in favor of their lobbying efforts rather than for the common good.

In the end, I believe that the concept of power and authority is incredibly skewed in our society.  I agree with this video that people have to start reconsidering the things they simply accept as the status quo, especially when a nation’s wellbeing is at stake.

Thursday, April 10, 2014

“Talk Dirty To Me” (SumBlog9)

After class on Wednesday, I got to wondering what other songs with catchy beats were in fact full of sexualization and objectification.   After asking my girlfriend what songs were catchy on the radio she suggested several, including the song “Talk Dirty to Me” by Jason Derulo (which I have provided a link to below). This song, albeit catchy, is incredibly sexualized and objectifies women significantly.  This in and of itself is a problem, but the even bigger problem is that this song is on the radio for people of all ages to hear.

Talk Dirty To Me

As we discussed in class, cultural transmission is the process of passing on culture from one generation to the next.  Values and beliefs used in the media can have a huge impact on how younger generations grow to identify their culture.  More specific to this post, the content of songs and music videos can be very influential in what kids view to be cultural norms.  In the song Derulo states that he does not need to understand the language that girls speak in, as long as he can tell when they are talking dirty to him.  He also implies that language does not matter, as long as women have a nice “booty.”  2 Chainz goes on to use several sexual innuendos concerning females and sexual acts. He also mentions that he lists women in his phone under the name “Big Booty.”

Lyrics like these present a lifestyle to our youth that portrays women as being sexual objects who are there to fulfill the sexual fantasies and desires of men.  They also represent women as only mattering for their ability to look sexy, talk dirty, and to obediently perform sexual behaviors.  I feel like sending this message to kids is inappropriate, and that this is a valid concern when one considers cultural transmission.  If kids see this behavior as a norm, the youth of our country will grow to expect it and accept it.  I personally find this to be very problematic, and I feel like something should be done to counteract this trend in mass media toward sexualization and objectification of women.

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Sociopoly (SumBlog8)

While participating in sociopoly during class I found myself thinking about how much it related to Chapter 29 from our reading.  In short, this reading talked about the inequality and inherent racism toward African Americans that can be found in both our criminal justice system and in our correctional system.  The chapter went on to describe how this racism leads to a lifetime of oppression for the Blacks in our country as a group.  It was this second theme of the chapter that I related the game to the most.
While playing Sociopoly I was a member of team four in group one.  This meant that my experience was supposed to be representative of a Black male in America compared to that of individuals of other races and genders.  My team started out with less money than every other group, and also was given the fewest “perks” and “kick-backs” along the way.  Throughout the course of the game, the odds were constantly stacked against us and we had to be a lot more cautious than the other teams in our group with our gameplay choices.  Though we tried to be very conservative in spending money, we still finished the game nearly bankrupt.  This was especially hard because our peers who were lucky enough to be White were having no problem navigating the game.

As I mentioned earlier, my experience in this game reminded me directly of the reading concerning prison and inequality toward African Americans.  The reading discussed how the inequality faced by Black individuals in turn stacks the odds against them, just like the sociopoly games rules stacked the odds against us.  The game was not set up to be fair, because the real-life experience of African American’s is not fair.  I felt that the game did a good job of representing this social fact in a creative way.  It also provided an opportunity to get a comparative example of what it is like to be members of different oppressed groups.  I personally never realized just how drastic the contemporary inequality was until after this activity and the subsequent lecture.  At first I thought that the game had been exaggerated, however the lecture showed just how skewed the real numbers are.